Friday, June 22, 2018

":THE PSYCHOS IN THE ROOM"

WE TOLD YOU BITCOIN WOULD COLLAPSE.WE TOLD YOU THE MARKET BEARS DIDNT GET IT. WE TOLD YOU THE DEFICIT WAS OVERPLAYED. WE TOLD YOU THE SCHOOLS WOULDNT BE PROTECTED ADEQUATELY. WE TOLD YOU THE OCCUPIERS WERE BULL. WE TOLD YOU RUSSIA WOULD DO NOTHING SIGNIFICANT. WE TOLD YOU MEDICAL COSTS WOULD ONLY RISE. WE ALSO MADE A FEW MISTAKES. WE ARE NOW TELLING YOU  THAT THE MOCK TRIAL OF MY STILL MOCK CHARACTER  GINGER  WILL PROTECT MANY OF YOU FROM MAKING THE SAME MISTAKE I MADE . WHEN I ORCHESTRATED THE WELL BEING OF MY DAUGHTER IN ONE OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT CHILD CUSTODY CASES THERE WERE FEW LIMITS THAT DEFINED MY ACTIONS. only LEGAL ONES.  NOW WE  RECOUNT AN UP AND COMING CRIMINAL CASE AGAINST GINGER.THE DEFENDANT WILL SOON. GET A NEW NAME  .                                                                                                                                                                                 THE DEFENDANT WILL BE SOMEONE THE  PLANTIFF BELIEVED WAS HIS TRUE  FRIEND.SOMEONE HE COULD TRUST WITH HIS FAMILIES LIVES.SOMEONE WHO HE LOOKED AFTER  UNDER ALL CONDITIONS .THE PLANTIFF  MISSED ALL THE SIGNS OF THE     MULTIPLE PERSONALITY..SHE IS A   GOOD  CAGEY CRIMINAL.THE FACTS   WILL BRING HER TO JUSTICE.THE UNKNOWN BRINGS ALL THINGS ON  THIS EARTH INTO BALANCE. EVEN IF IT  IS JUST WITH THE HORROR OF LIVING WITH ONES HISTORY AND BEING IN A STATE OF LIFE LONG ANXIETY. I  TRIED TO SAVE HER BUT IN THE END GINGER WAS ALWAYS  TRASH.  RUNNING WILL ONLY RUIN OTHERS  IN HER PROXIMITY.                                                                                                                                                                                                         THE   OUTLINE                                                                                                                                                INSTEAD OF   A VERY LARGE PROFIT THE DEFENDANT LOST  .HE LOST A HUGE OPPORTUNITY TO ADVANCE HIS PORTFOLIO VALUE.       THE DEFENDANT DID NOT WANT EMPLOYER TO BENEFIT, BECAUSE HE WOULD NEVER  LEAVE HIS WIFE.AT  ONE POINT THE DELUSIONAL DEFENDANT WAS ASKED  BUT YOU HAVE EVERYTHING. THE DEFENDANTS RESPONSE WAS,, YES YES BUT I DONT HAVE YOU.    LOSSES MEANT LESS MONEY FOR  LEGAL BILLS TO PERSECUTE HER FRAUDS.THE DEFENDANT DISPICABLY INTERFERED IN THE PLANTIFFS ABILITY  TO  PAY HIS BILLS.(LESS MONEY IS LESS MONEY)THE DEFENDANT HAS LEFT THE STATE.THE DEFENDANT WAS EMPLOYED FOR 25 YEARS,SHE OCCUPIED HIS OFFICE.HE TRUSTED THE DEFENDANT.SHE HAD ACCESS TO HIS COMPUTER SHE WAS CAPABLE OF FINDING HIS PASSWORDS.SHE WAS NEVER GIVEN PERMISSION TO USE HIS SIGNON TO IMPERSONATE HIM.    SHE WAS ALWAYS TOLD TO USE HER OWN .                                                                                                                                                                                                                    SHE WAS TRUSTED  ALMOST LIKE A PARTNER EVEN THOUGH  SHE WAS A HIRED AS AN ASSISTANT .,(NO NEGATIVE IMPLIED.)SHE WAS TRAINED BY THE PLANTIFF  IN   HIS BUSINESS.       THE PLANTIFF CREATED  A  UNIQUE INVESTMENT METHOD.THE DEFENDANT USED THE PLANTIFFS SIGNON.TO ACCESS HIS ACCOUNTS SHE WAS TRUSTED TO PROVIDE ACCURATE  PORTFOLIO REPORTS.  ..SHE CONVINCED THE PLANTIFF THAT  THE REAL   BROKERAGE STATEMENTS WERE CONFUSING ,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         THE DEFENDANT DEVISED A SCHEME.SHE LIED AND LIED AND LIED.THE PLANTIFF HAD NUMEROUS SAFEGUARDS AGAINST INVESTMENT LOSS. THE SAFEGUARDS AROUND FINANCIAL,ACCOUNTING AND COMMOM PRACTICES OF FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITY  COULD HAVE
BEEN DIFFERENT.    T HE PLANTIFF DID NOT  FORESEE   ' A  WOLF IN THE HEN HOUSE. '                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 THE DEFENDANT CREATED HUNDREDS OF FAKE PORTFOLIOS.ALL THE PLANTIFFS DAILY REVIEWS  WERE OF REPORTS THAT WERE FALSE. THIS IS SIMILAR  TO MADOFF OR OTHER  CON  ARTISTS.     EVERY SINGLE DIRECTED  INVESTMENT GENERATED A NEW PORTFOLIO, ALL WERE FRAUDULENTLY PREPARED.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   THE PORTFOLIOS PROCESS WAS CLEAR SIMPLE AND EASILY REPORTED AND EXECUTED.THE DEFENDANT DID PREPARE REPORTS..THEY WERE JUST ALL  FALSE, LIES,AND  DECEPTIONS .I WOULD  SAY    SMALL SCALE MADOFF.  THE  DEFENDANT ACTED WITH PREPLANNED MALICE AND AN ATTEMPT TO  PLAY OUT A SICK MIND AT THE PLANTIFFS EXPENSE
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       WE WILL DESCRIBE THE PROCESS ANOTHER DAY. VERY SOON
 

Shepard Osherow. All Rights Reserved