As a general rule, the tax returns of Candidate Romney should be considered as private as anyone else's.
Some people get cancer, they need a top cancer oncologist. Should they ask the Doctor for his tax returns? They might be indicative of a fraudulent mentality. Would that even affect their surgical ability?
There are three main things to consider:
1. It is highly likely that Candidate Romney's returns have been prepared by a certified public accountant and possibly even a major accounting firm. Is Obama saying that the accounting firm has participated in illegal activities and certified Romney's tax return in spite of the fact that there is an indication by Obama of a tax impropriety?
2. The government runs the IRS. It is likely that Candidate Romney's tax returns have been audited by the IRS if not once, many times. If they haven't been it might indicate a possible significant oversight by the government or after years of auditing the Romney returns, they hardly ever found anything that would suggest malfeasance.
3. To make the Obama attacks on Romney's privacy being invaded without claiming that his returns are in someway fraudulent sounds like nothing more than negative, outrageous and unnecessary politics.
A person and his church are also a private matter. Since President Obama attended Reverend Wright's sermons for many years, why not have all of them released to the public? The moral and social ethics of this President might become much clearer even as he attempts to indite the morals of Romney.
If the Democrats want Romney's returns for more years let them state that they expect to find tax fraud. Otherwise, let the IRS and the CPA's do their jobs. Stop attempting to mislead the American public.
P.S. IF ROMNEY HAS A LOW TAX RATE, I AM SURE HE IS FOLLOWING THE RULES OF TAX CODE. HE MAY EVEN OWN MUNICIPAL BONDS WHICH ARE TAX FREE TO EVERYONE, ETC. ETC.
Some people get cancer, they need a top cancer oncologist. Should they ask the Doctor for his tax returns? They might be indicative of a fraudulent mentality. Would that even affect their surgical ability?
There are three main things to consider:
1. It is highly likely that Candidate Romney's returns have been prepared by a certified public accountant and possibly even a major accounting firm. Is Obama saying that the accounting firm has participated in illegal activities and certified Romney's tax return in spite of the fact that there is an indication by Obama of a tax impropriety?
2. The government runs the IRS. It is likely that Candidate Romney's tax returns have been audited by the IRS if not once, many times. If they haven't been it might indicate a possible significant oversight by the government or after years of auditing the Romney returns, they hardly ever found anything that would suggest malfeasance.
3. To make the Obama attacks on Romney's privacy being invaded without claiming that his returns are in someway fraudulent sounds like nothing more than negative, outrageous and unnecessary politics.
A person and his church are also a private matter. Since President Obama attended Reverend Wright's sermons for many years, why not have all of them released to the public? The moral and social ethics of this President might become much clearer even as he attempts to indite the morals of Romney.
If the Democrats want Romney's returns for more years let them state that they expect to find tax fraud. Otherwise, let the IRS and the CPA's do their jobs. Stop attempting to mislead the American public.
P.S. IF ROMNEY HAS A LOW TAX RATE, I AM SURE HE IS FOLLOWING THE RULES OF TAX CODE. HE MAY EVEN OWN MUNICIPAL BONDS WHICH ARE TAX FREE TO EVERYONE, ETC. ETC.
interesting, but I still think he should release his returns! what does he have to hide? I think the leader of the free world should be transparent!
ReplyDelete